Defined Maturity ETFs Pull in $239M

Share

Weekly Channel Summary

The FI: Specialty channel, with a total AUM of $67B across 129 ETFs from 14 issuers, saw significant activity this past week. The channel recorded flows of $0.26B over the last 5 days, bringing Year-to-Date (YTD) flows to $13.66B and total 1-Year flows to $18.39B.

This Week’s Performance Leaders and Laggards

The best-performing category this week was “Fixed Income: Specialty – Maturing Ladder,” which posted a 0.69% return and is also positive Year-to-Date. The worst-performing category was “Fixed Income: Specialty – Defined Maturity,” with a weekly return of 0.07%, though it remains positive YTD.

Category Performance Snapshot

Category WTD 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month YTD 1 Year
Fixed Income: Specialty – Interest Rate Volatility 0.11% -0.43% -2.18% -1.86% -1.52% 2.06%
Fixed Income: Specialty – Defined Maturity -0.30% 0.39% 2.16% 3.61% 5.74% 5.81%
Fixed Income: Specialty – Maturing Ladder -0.58% 0.77% 3.89% 3.18% 6.80% 3.87%

Top & Bottom 5 ETFs by Weekly Performance

The single best-performing ETF was the Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX). The two worst-performing ETFs were the Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and the Invesco BulletShares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU).

Ticker Fund Name WTD Performance
Top Performers
HYKE Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF 2.96%
RYSE Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF 2.22%
PFIX Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF 1.60%
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF 0.41%
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF 0.08%
Bottom Performers
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF -3.78%
IBGK iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF -1.21%
IBGL iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF -1.17%
LFBE LifeX 2065 Longevity Income ETF -1.11%
LFDR LifeX Durable Income ETF -1.11%

Analyzing the Weekly Flows

The FI: Specialty channel saw a total net flow of $261M this week. The category that received the most inflows was “Specialty – Defined Maturity” with $239M, which has a total AUM of $66.4B.

Category Flows Summary

Category Fund Count AUM 5 Day 30 Day 90 Day YTD 1 Year
Specialty – Defined Maturity 98 $66.4B $239M $1,407M $4,549M $13,348M $18,154M
Specialty – Interest Rate Volatility 10 $1.0B $18M $44M $133M $176M $92M
Fixed Income: Specialty – Maturing Ladder 20 $0.2B $5M ($52M) ($88M) $141M $142M

Top & Bottom 5 ETFs by 5-Day Flow

The top ETF for inflows was the iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR). The top two ETFs for outflows were the Invesco Bulletshares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP) and the iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ).

Ticker Fund Name 5-Day Flow
Inflows
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF $29M
IBDX iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF $28M
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF $26M
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF $21M
IVOL KraneShares Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF $18M
Outflows
BSCP Invesco Bulletshares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF ($34M)
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF ($14M)
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF ($9M)
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF ($7M)
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF ($6M)

Issuer League Table Update

The top 2 issuers by market share remain iShares and Invesco. iShares gathered the most in weekly inflows with $194M, while FolioBeyond saw the largest outflows with -$1M.

Top 5 Issuers by AUM

Brand Fund Count AUM AUM Market Share
iShares 51 $38.60B 57.13%
Invesco 31 $27.61B 40.86%
Quadratic 1 $0.45B 0.67%
Simplify 2 $0.27B 0.41%
SPDR 16 $0.22B 0.33%

Top & Bottom 3 Issuers by 5-Day Flow

Brand 5-Day Flow
Inflows
iShares $194M
Invesco $45M
Quadratic $18M
Outflows
FolioBeyond -$1M
ProShares $0M
Global X $0M

For a deeper dive into these trends, access our FREE, in-depth Thematic ETF reports in the right side panel of this page.

Disclosures

This material is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. All investments, including ETFs, involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investors should consider their investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing.

This analysis was developed by the team at ETF Action. We leverage advanced AI tools to assist in the drafting and refinement of our content, based on our expert prompts, direction, and final review.